Dancing Through the Minefield: Some Observations on the Theory, Method, and Politics in Feminist Literary Criticism: Annette Kolodny: “Dancing Through the. Annette Kolodny quotes. Quote:”Dancing through the Minefield: Some Observations on the Theory, Practice, and Politics of a Feminist Literary Criticism” . Dancing Through the Minefield: Some Observations on the Theory, Practice, and Politics of a Feminist Annette Kolodny – – Feminist Studies 14 (3)

Author: Kajar Totaxe
Country: Saudi Arabia
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Personal Growth
Published (Last): 23 June 2014
Pages: 327
PDF File Size: 1.72 Mb
ePub File Size: 12.99 Mb
ISBN: 375-4-61526-872-4
Downloads: 34869
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Grogore

Finally, Kolodny “strives to undo the unconsciousness of the reader identified” [7] in the second part of her theory:.

Of these, “Dancing Through the Minefield” is the most well-known, and has been called “the most reprinted essay of American feminist throuhg criticism”. I suppose that it truly is evidence of a patriarchally controlled world that the portrait presented to most people of feminists is to use mild hyperbole one throughh consists only of indignant militants and not one of such delightful, impassioned, and brilliant thinkers as Kolodny. It embodied, as well as upheld, the dominant ideology of the time, and had implications beyond aesthetic values.

Likewise, The Land Before Her exemplifies the same ideas from a different point of view in the ideal of the domestic garden, or the altering of nature. Dancing Between Left and Right: She questions the basis for judging which works should remain in the canon, which should be added, and which removed. But the emphases were different…Avoiding for a time male assertions of tthe rediscovered Edenwomen claimed the frontiers as a potential sanctuary for an idealized domesticity.

Views Read Edit View history.

Literary history is a fiction. Sign in Create an account. Kolodny points that our sense and understanding of our history and our believes in the historical canon does not reflect our full understanding of the past. I find it difficult to create a summary of this excerpt; I found so much that was enjoyable and noteworthy in it that I fear my summary may be longer than the excerpt itself.

We do not read classics in order to recreate the past. Our understanding of the meaning of any text is a result of our needs and desires as well as our predisposition. You are commenting using your WordPress.


The whole theory of Annette Kolodny is based on the differences between male and female ways of reading the codes of literature. It was stipulated that the royalties from this text go to the Penobscot.

Annette Kolodny

Since the grounds upon which we assign aesthetic value kolody texts are never infallible, unchangeable, or universal, we must reexamine not only our aesthetics butas well, the inherent biases and assumptions informing the critical methods which in part shape our aesthetic responses. First, any construction of a literary canon is a social construction; second, readers unconsciously engage texts from a certain point-of-view; and third, this unconscious bias present in all readers must be consciously and critically re-examined.

These three propositions are: To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Towards Marxist Feminist Biblical Criticism. In recent years, the monolithic nature of the canon has been challenged, and works by previously ignored sections of the literary world women, homosexualsand ethnic minorities have gained some footholds in the canon.

In other words, we have to forger our history. She asserts if people are reading the women authors they have discovered thus far, then their predecessors, other women authors from the past, must be reevaluated as well. This site uses cookies. I chose this article by Kolodny because it marks a specific point in kolosny history from which I can build in writing my essay. Over the course of her scholarly career, Kolodny has received grants and fellowships from the National Endowment for the Humanities, the Ford Foundation, the Guggenheim Foundation, the Rockefeller Humanities Fellowship, and others.

ENGL 810: PAB#1: On Annette Kolodny, “Dancing through the Minefield”

Her books have won many awards both in the United States and abroad. Patterson states that “despite its language and intent, [the essay]…represents classistwhite, and heterosexist attitudes which are common in feminist literary criticism and which contradict the best of feminist thought and the aims of the women’s movement” Patterson, The third and final section, “Book Three: Examples of this would include liberal feminismsocialist feminismand ecofeminism.

After graduation, she took a position on the editorial staff at Newsweek. Sometimes, because of our reading habits, our reading become fixed which means that our expectations later on will be the same specially when we read works which follow the work which we read it first. In other words switch traditional roles. Her final assertion, that individual scholarly work in feminist criticism, while to some degree intrinsically valuable, is most worthwhile and worthy when it is in service of the goal of improving the lives of all women, underscores one of my most fervently held beliefs: There were no triumphant heroes of the order of Minrfield Boone or Davey Crockett ; rather, the narratives of these women focused on the triumph of domesticity and order in a wild land.


We have to establish new norms of evaluation of our works of art by developing our critical methods of evaluation which we used before. Male writers will be better readers if they read works written dancign women. In other words, our history.

Kolodny is also well known for two essays published in For all her throufh language, however, Kolodny is careful not to slip too far into the realm of wishful fantasy. Briefly, social constructionism is a school of thought that involves looking at the ways social phenomena are created, by people. In chapter 2, “Surveying the Virgin Land: Kolodny suggests that we have to create new ways of judging our literary works that we have to find other ways and methods.

The Yellow Wall Paper.

Annette Kolodny – Wikipedia

Lynda Zwinger – – Hypatia 7 2: Notify me of new comments via email. We have to go beyond the aesthetics evaluations and look for interpretive paradigms and develop our critical method of evaluation. Rather, they must be taken into the world through activism. Kolodny specifically refers to a feminist pluralism, which validates “multiple interpretations of various texts” [7] according to the usefulness of a pluralistic view of a text.

This misunderstanding also depend on the differences between us such as knowledge, believes, points of view, as well as the difference between times.