Buy Elogio de la Irreligion by John Allen Paulos (ISBN: ) from Amazon’s Book Store. Everyday low prices and free delivery on eligible orders. Elogio de la Irreligion by John Allen Paulos, , TusQuets edition. Elogio de la irreligion/ Irreligion: Un Matematico explica por que los argumentos a favor de la existencia de Dios, sencillamente, no se sostienenA Why the.
|Published (Last):||22 April 2017|
|PDF File Size:||6.64 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||9.87 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Nov 27, Martin Crim rated it it was ok. Another excellent book from the author of ‘Innumeracy’ – this time he takes on about all the arguments for the existence of God, at least in any of the forms envisioned by mainstream religions. Oct 03, D.
Don’t fuss about with how liberal secular scholars hatefully claim they got there. To ask other readers questions about Irreligionplease sign up.
Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why the Arguments for God Just Don’t Add Up
Feb 05, David rated it liked it Shelves: I think that it would be of the same nature as evidence for, say, dark matter. I really liked Paulos’ random humor sprinkled throughout as well. This is not that book. The latter arguments, Paulos relates in irrreligion characteristically lighthearted style, range from what might be called golden oldies to those with a more contemporary beat. The author is a mathematician, but no math is involved in this book, just logic.
Amazon Advertising Find, attract, and engage customers. Apr 18, Rod rated it did not like it Shelves: You’d think it would understand that my negative rating means I don’t care for this junk. This book will explain WHY the arguments for God irgeligion don’t add up.
Feb 01, Adam rated it liked it Recommends it for: The latter arguments, Paulos relates in his characteristically lighthearted style, “range from what might be called golden oldies to those with a more contemporary beat. There are no discussion topics on this book yet. But to help the guy out again Which leads us to John’s desperate for any material to fill this atheistic propaganda pamphlet chapter on: But that is fine, because unlike other books on this subject, Paulos does not throw things in your face.
Write e,ogio customer review. It’s one thing to desire to remove religious values, but it’s another to boldy hold up something else in its place that is a guaranteed noble and goodly truth. The autho Atheist authors such as John Allen Elogil strive to bring out a contrarian streak in their readers, but they may get more than they bargain for – though I’ve been irreoigion religion-free for over a year now, I have yet to find an irreliigon book that doesn’t disappoint me in some way.
Amazon Second Chance Pass it on, trade it in, give it a second life. This is not really this book’s fault, but I was hoping that a book by a mathematician would have less personality and would just state the argument and the rebuttal.
Near the end of ‘Irreligion’ he gets more serious in arguing for acceptance of atheists as an increasingly necessary form irrelgion tolerance akin to that being laa by ethnic, racial, gender-identity, and indeed religious minorities. Second, a ‘deity hypothesis’ that actually predicts and explains natural phenomenon is no longer in the realm of the supernatural, and therefore does not refer to a deity at all.
This small, breezy book covers many of the main arguments for god. But, anyone interested in a mathematical glean on the proofs for god could benefit from this book.
This of course is pointless to discuss with atheists and fun! Jul 10, Jerrod rated it really liked it Recommends it for: Toward the middle of the book, Paulos acknowledges the metaphor of a person with perfect pitch trying to explain music to someone who is tone deaf, but he then pivots to an analogy of sightedness ce.
: Elogio de la irreligion (Spanish Edition) (): John Allen Paulos: Books
All that assumed self-righteous belittling of the Jesus of Scripture – with a promise that arguments for God just won’t add up. Interspersed among his twelve counterarguments are remarks on a variety of irreligious themes, ranging from the nature of miracles and creationist probability to cognitive illusions elogko prudential wagers.
Quattro paginette in cui, trascurando il consiglio dell’autore di non “attaccare aggressivamente e sul piano personale la fede degli altri bollandola come cumulo di sciocchezze”, Odiffredi parte in quarta affermando, non si sa con quanta ironia, che i credenti renderebbero “questo mondo molto peggiore con la loro presenza”, e ammonendoci poi irreligipn “sarebbe un eccesso di stima [sia mai!
There was a problem filtering reviews right now.
Read Elogio de la irreligion Spanish Edition Full EBook – video dailymotion
I listened to the audio version which las I have been a long time fan of John Allen Paulos ‘s Innumeracy: Einstein at one point was unable to prove his contentions so he invented a “cosmological constant” to finagle his way out of things.
Manufacturer warranty may not apply Learn more about Amazon Global Store. He runs through the various arguments for the existence of God, and points out the fallacies in each. What disappointed me about the book was actually one of the ground rules Paulos set down for himself: Atheism doesn’t care or really have any equality or justice. Most of their deities were invented by primitive people who imagined god as a kind of really big and powerful person. A lo largo de los siglos, la humanidad ha tratado de formular argumentos supuestamente basados en la razon para fundamentar la fe en un ser a primera vista todopoderoso, maximamente bondadoso y omnisciente.
Just getting started Is this guy krreligion another nerd who had his girlfriend stolen by some buffed up religious guy? His writing is concise, not repetitive at all, and yet the occasional humorous approach helps to keep one’s interest. Instead, Paulos offers us plain old English. Quite fun, lq skates very fast over a lot of the arguments.
Wait till your eight year old daughter turns sixteen: Books of any genre written by atheists and agnostics? If a Beatles song were to describe the logical fallacies underlying belief in a god, that is. John Allen Paulos Dimensions: Which I think would be only slightly offensive to any theist reading it, though I can’t imagine any theist picking it up unless they were already beyond them self in such irfeligion way as to not get offended.
Alas, this emaciated volume is yet another primer for arguing with fundies on the internet.