Jacob Aagaard – Excelling at Chess Calculation, Capitalizing on Tactical Chances () pdf – Download as PDF File .pdf) or view presentation. All other sales enquiries should be directed to Everyman Chess, Gloucester Man- concentrate on the endgame, prophylaxis, calculation and more general. The standard back cover hype reads, “The art of chess calculation is the absolute key to the success of a player. Master this discipline and you.
|Published (Last):||14 March 2007|
|PDF File Size:||3.42 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.20 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Excelling at Chess Calculation: Capitalizing on Tactical Chances
Customers who viewed this item also viewed. Thinking inside the Box. The now-standard moves 1. Let’s get this straight: Stephen Jiang No, I do not.
Quality Chess Blog » How to read Jacob’s books
The question in practice is whether anyone can decide by explicit means to what extent other factors in a excellign middlegame are equal. In fact, this exact opening variation was a Kasparov speciality, and the key position to assess and analyse was one directly stemming from theory that he created.
When I talk about Kasparov’s decisions in one particular, extremely dynamic, game a King’s Indian vs. E-Mail will not be published required. I think GM Alex Yermolinsky said that, too, in one of his books.
Since the diverse considerations are interdependent and also time-dependent, one normally requires experience and analysis to get around the problem.
Essentially he’s saying that endgame positions are somehow more significant than middlegames with respect to assessing pieces’ fundamental strength – why on earth would that be? Aagaard’s books seem to have a “you must be this tall to ride” feel to them especially excelking, 3 and 5 and are catered to above-average players.
Jacob Aagaard’s “Excelling” series
I personally prefer a degree of “leavening” of the chessic dough, otherwise I get tired quickly. Randy rated it really liked it Mar 01, Withoutabox Submit to Film Festivals.
September 6th, at But with an open mind, Aagard might have noticed the main thing: But as his notes show, it discourages Black’s counterplaya3, Bf2, f4 we’re up to 4 pawn moves, and both the bishop and pawn just moved for the second time. I believe there are excellig books in the series.
And I wasn’t just talking about breaking rules, as he asserts in his next paragraph, but discussing characteristics of modern calxulation. Jacob Aagaard Jacob, the Yusupov books are really good.
And modern players, it is generally acknowledged, are increasingly aware how often compensation sometimes very subtle exists for the ches, i. The exercises were collected and analysed dalculation me and the book finished by John, so that the tone is his, but the structure and ideas are mine and the direction something John and I have always worked together on.
Share your thoughts with other customers. Master this discipline and you can surely expect your results to improve dramatically.
But it is also too vague to be meaningful. One of several new books on chess tactical calculation or planning? Using a bizarre line of reasoning, Aagard tries to dismiss my discussion of the rule about knights being weak on the edge of the board: I guess it’s a matter of personal taste.
Excelling at Technical Chess can be read later; it works well Endgame Playwhich is also not on your list. Will I be ready for Reassess after carefully working through AM?
Jacob Aagaard’s “Excelling” series – Chess Forums –
If you go through all of these books in the way I describe, you will have more effective training than most young chess players in the World. Would they find Aagard’s rule useful to follow? Sep 20, 7. I thought Practical Chess Defense was significantly harder than the other ones, so I do not own it yet! It concentrates instead upon specific generalities that are losing relevance in today’s game. October 5th, at None of the above seems to me to be very controversial, much less brilliant – the more difficult and interesting issues arise when wxcelling discusses the specifics of pawn and piece play with these concepts in mind.
Similarly, Aagard tries to undercut my argument about the rules regarding bishops and knights in open and closed positions.