Gadamer i filozofijska hermeneutika [Book Review] 55 (4) Klasična I Filozofska Hermeneutika. Gadamerova Hermeneutika a Nedogmatická Dialektika. Filozofska Hermeneutika I Estetička Teorija: Ontologija I Filozofija Jezika: Etika– Drugo D. Barbarić I T. Bracanović (Ur.): Gadamer I Filozofijska Hermeneutika. hans gadamer: hermeneutika (megértés tudománya) művészet olyan emberi produktum, melyet megértésre szántak művészet úgy működik, mint nincs.

Author: Faucage Shamuro
Country: Antigua & Barbuda
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Video
Published (Last): 25 August 2010
Pages: 354
PDF File Size: 9.79 Mb
ePub File Size: 16.5 Mb
ISBN: 742-6-21577-886-5
Downloads: 42910
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Mubei

Inasmuch as understanding always occurs against the background of our prior involvement, so it always occurs on the basis of our history. The “meaning” emerges not hermeneutikw an object that lies in the text or in the interpreter, but rather an event gxdamer results from the interaction of the two. The German-language edition of Gadamer’s Collected Works includes a volume in which Gadamer elaborates his argument and discusses the critical response to the book.

Wachterhauser, Brice,Beyond Being: In that same year, Gadamer also contracted poliomyelitis, from which he recovered only slowly, and the after-effects of which remained with him for the rest of his life.

Hans-Georg Gadamer

Lawn, Chris,Gadamer: Gadamer habilitated in and spent most of the early s lecturing in Marburg. The revealing of things is, in fact, always dependent upon other things being simultaneously concealed in much the same way as seeing hermeneutoka in one way depends on not seeing it in another.

Di Cesare, Donatella,Gadamer: Jean Grondin has said that Orozco is engaged in a “witch-hunt” [19] while Donatella Di Cesare said that “the archival material on which Orozco bases her argument is actually quite negligible”.

Grondin, Jean,The Philosophy of Gadamertrans. Gadamer had first met Heidegger in Frieburg in earlyhaving also corresponded with him in The concept of phronesis can itself be seen as providing a certain elaboration of the dialogic conception of understanding Gadamer had already found in Plato. Paul Friedlander introduced him to philological study, and Gadamer also received encouragement from Rudolf Bultmann.

The tradition in which an interpreter stands establishes “prejudices” that affect how he or she will make interpretations. For these writers, as for many others, the basic problem of hermeneutics was methodological: Retrieved March 25, Wikiquote has quotations related to: Gadamer I Filozofijska Hermeneutika. Indeed, one can take all of these ideas as providing slightly different elaborations of what is essentially the same basic conception of understanding—one that takes our finitude, that is, our prior involvement and partiality, not as a barrier to understanding, but rather as its enabling condition.


Thus, to take a simple example, if we wish to understand some particular artwork, we hermeeutika need to have some prior understanding of that work even if only uermeneutika a set of paint marks on canvasotherwise it cannot even be seen as something to be understood. Palmer, in Hahn ed. Pol Vandevelde and Arun Iyer, London: Gadamer was not alone in being the recipient of such criticism—Heidegger was also unimpressed by Jacob Klein and was certainly prone to deliver harsh judgments on his students and colleagues—but Gadamer seems to have been more particularly affected by it.

Retrieved 16 January Not only is there no methodology that describes the means by which to arrive at an understanding of the human or the historical, but neither is there any such methodology that is adequate to the understanding of the non-human or the natural.

Gadamer’s philosophical project, as explained in Truth and Methodwas to elaborate on the concept of ” philosophical hermeneutics “, which Heidegger initiated but never dealt with at length. During the s and s, Gadamer was able to accommodate himself, on his account, reluctantly, first to National Socialism and then briefly, to Communism.

The basic model of understanding that Gadamer finally arrives at in Truth and Method is that of conversation.

Brandom, Robert,Tales of the Mighty Dead: Thus the artwork has a festive, as well as symbolic and playful character, since the festival similarly takes us out of ordinary time, while also opening us up to the true possibility of community. Causal theory of reference Contrast theory of meaning Contrastivism Conventionalism Cratylism Deconstruction Descriptivist theory of names Direct reference theory Dramatism Expressivism Linguistic determinism Logical atomism Logical positivism Mediated reference theory Nominalism Non-cognitivism Phallogocentrism Quietism Relevance theory Semantic externalism Hermenfutika holism Structuralism Supposition theory Symbiosism Theological noncognitivism Theory of descriptions Verification theory.

The most profound of these is the formulation of the dialogic coordinates, a standard set of prerequisite communication elements necessary for inciting dialogue.

In the Italian introduction to Truth and MethodGadamer said that his work on Greek philosophy was “the best and most original part” of his career. In contrast with the traditional hermeneutic account, Gadamer thus advances a view of understanding that rejects the idea of understanding as achieved through gaining access to some inner realm of subjective meaning.

In the dialogue of understanding our prejudices come to the fore, both inasmuch as they play a crucial role in opening up what is to be understood, and inasmuch as they themselves become evident in that process. In Truth and MethodGadamer argued that “truth” and “method” were at odds with one another. Find it on Scholar. Malpas, Jeff, and Hans-Helmuth Gander eds. Design as Way of ThinkingLondon: A Critique of Modern AestheticsLondon: Risser, James,Hermeneutics and the Voice of the Other: He resisted his father’s urging to take up the natural sciences and became more and more interested in the humanities.


It is important to recognize, however, that the unconcealment at issue is not a matter of the bringing about of some form of complete and absolute transparency. No keywords specified fix it.

Hans-Georg Gadamer, Sémantika a hermeneutika – PhilPapers

See Palmer for a reply. While Gadamer did not identify himself strongly with either regime he was never a member of the National Socialist Party, although he did belong to the affiliated National Socialist Teachers Unionneither did he draw attention to himself by outright opposition.

Gadamer scholars Gadamer—Derrida debate. The only way to understand Plato, as Gadamer saw it, was thus by working through the Platonic texts in a way that not only enters into the dialogue and dialectic set out in those texts, but also repeats that dialogic movement in the attempt at understanding as such. Gadamer has himself engaged, however, in more direct reflection on a range of contemporary issues see Gadamer a, a, b, b, see also Krajewski Such an objection can be seen as a simple reiteration of the basic tendency towards subjectivism that Gadamer rejects, but Gadamer also takes issue directly with this view of prejudice and the negative connotations often associated with the notion, arguing that, rather than closing us off, our prejudices are themselves what open us up to what is to be understood.

The Heidelberg Conferencetrans. Hermeneutics concerns our fundamental mode of being in the world and understanding is thus the basic phenomenon in our existence.

In the meantime, from —35, Gadamer held a temporary professorship at Kiel, and then, intook up the Directorship of the Philosophical Institute at the University of Leipzig, becoming Dean of the Faculty inand Rector inbefore returning to teaching and research at Frankfurt-am-Main in