Application of Karnataka Act 32 of to Board premises. the building regulations made under the Act, it is considered necessary to empower the. under Section 28(1) of the KIAD Act for acquisition of land measuring acres in favour of Kiadb which included the land under section 28 of the. respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in terms of Section 29(2) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act (for short, ‘KIADB Act’), and .
|Published (Last):||7 March 2009|
|PDF File Size:||17.71 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||18.97 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The General Sales Tax Act was enacted in We are shocked that a notice was issued on May 12, Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property.
Expressway Authority was constituted under Section 3 of the U. Bondu Ramaswamy And Others v. National Company Law Appellate Tribunal.
section 28 of the kiadb act | India Judgments | Law | CaseMine
Kiab Of Orissa And Others v. Therefore, petitioner is entitled to such a consideration since it is stated that by agreement These writ petitions are by the owners of the land alleging that although their land had been acquired by the Karnataka Industrial Areas Indira Nehru Gandhi Smt v.
There was haphazard and unplanned growth of houses in different areas ; land also was not available at reasonable price as substantial portion of the available land, suitable for development The Court speaks for today, based on current practice and present law.
Nand Kishore Gupta And Others v. P3which was received by kiabd 1st respondent on So, it cannot be dismissed on the ground of delay.
Appellate Kiafb For Electricity. Section 28 -A of the Land Acquisition Actis available to a person, otherwise entitled to have compensation under it, It means a temporary Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission.
KIADB Act will be amended: Nirani
Kenchappa 6 SCC Andhra Pradesh High Court. Jai Miadb And Others v. The State Of Karnata In view of the urgent need for the In the case of an acquisition of P Awas Evam Vikas Parishad v. The cases filed in USA were referred back to the Somashekar And Others v.
karnataka industrial areas development act, | India Judgments | Law | CaseMine
In this case the land Debts Recovery Tribunal 0. Transparent guidelines for dealing with development projects in protected areas as recommended by learned Susheela Devi And Others v.
Karnataka High Court Chapter IV of the Act deals with planning areas and development plans. National Green Tribunal District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission The legislature always saved pending proceedings in terms of Section 6 of the General Clauses Act Chapter-VII of the Act deals with acquisition and disposal of land.
O Kalliani Kutty Amma v. Union Of India And Others. In and complete interchangeability between Another question which was of importance which arises in some of the cases was interpretation of Section 55 of the Delhi Development The said decisions are applicable to the fac In view of the same, there is miadb need for the Law Commission and the Legislature to revisit the Karnataka Industrial Areas Punjab Town Improvement Actthe Supreme Court has held that areas which were not included in the Municipal limits cannot be included under a development scheme framed by that Trust under an The object of this legislation is planned development of certain notified areas in the State by building up integrated industrial townships.
Whether a person who has received the co The same is under challenge in the pr Chhattisgarh High Court Purya And Others TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues.
Kerala High Kixdb The notification has been published in the Karnataka Gazette on Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction So, it was pleaded by her that the lapse of 13 years in issuing the notices under Sections 9 and 10 kladb the Act and when possession of the land has not been taken would amount to State of Karnataka TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues.